Since time began humans have committed wrong doings regardless of what race they belong to, what colour their skin is or what religion they choose to follow. It is human nature to be tribal, to survive – this is coded deep in our DNA back to caveman times.

The utopia of everyone living together in harmony is an impossible dream because it counters nature – this is merely a scientific fact.  From a very local level (local football teams despising each other, neighbours bickering), through to north/south divides through to global politics, we are born to stay with who we know and trust and regard ‘others’ as a threat.

However, only the white race is made to feel guilt for the sins of their ancestors and only the white race is accused of being ‘privileged’.  This is based on old power structures and on older white men who were making decisions developing much of the world.  Who were these old white men that mean the white race must now suffer for their misdeeds, but not be celebrated for their immeasurable successes?

I am proud to be mixed race white and I believe that I must defend my white side, which seems to be taking a hammering from all sides. There are more than enough people defending the Pakistani side.

Growing up mixed race in a time when there were few mixed race people was difficult and I experienced racism from both sides.

The Pakistani side never accepted me and for them I would always be the ‘white woman’s daughter’ and on the white side I would have a hard time for being brown.  In my experience it was worse from the Pakistani side than the white side.

My white side is more accepting and they see beyond my skin colour and my Pakistani father. Of course there are some who see me as a half-breed, sand nigger or mud.  Just more labels to add to the ones I already heard and was called while I was growing up. I am a reminder to them of their race being slowly eradicated.

Thankfully apart from on social media I rarely meet people like that in real life.

The Pakistani side is VERY racist and this racism is something we never talk about because ONLY white people can be racist, right?

Many Pakistanis use the word ‘gori’ when talking about white women, gori means fair skin but is often used to imply white women are easy, loose and with no morals.

It is common for Pakistanis to loathe black people more than they do the white people, and many Pakistanis would prefer their children to marry a white person than a black one.

But again that is something we never hear or talk about.

Pakistanis are jealous of what the white race has achieved. They have been in the UK since the 60s and have been sending their remittance back home. Yet back home is mainly still a shit hole, there is no significant industry, no roads, and no decent infrastructure.  There are however massive mansions dotted across the barren landscape, as corruption is rife.

Many men do not work; instead they lounge about all day waiting for the remittance to arrive or the visa to allow them entry into the UK, the racist UK, where they can marry their first cousin.  Their first cousin who is taken out of school, not allowed to finish her education to become a baby-making machine.  The UK allows this but yes this is a racist country. How odd for such a terrible country, people from all round the world cross Europe to get here.

In Great Britain our councillors and MPs are encouraged to have pride in the flag of Pakistan and they happily pose, alongside Pakistani MPS and councillors, for pictures while the flag is being waved.

These same people claim that the flag of England is racist as is the Union Jack flag. Everyone can have pride in their flag but not the white British people.  If British people have pride then they are shamed. Even the Scottish nationalists are not talked about in the same terms as the English nationalists.

A Muslim woman wearing the Union Jack as a hijab is viewed as empowering while a white pregnant woman waving the Union Jack flag was taken to one side because a Pakistani man felt insulted.  So it is now a symbol of oppression as the poor Muslims are frightened by it, yet it doesn’t, of course, stop them coming to the UK in huge numbers.

Great Britain is the least racist country and, is in my opinion, far too tolerant.  We opened our country to mass immigration and many areas have been turned into a shit hole.  Many Muslims refuse to integrate while many more refuse to work.  The burden on British taxpayers is in the billions per annum, with up to 75% of Muslim women on benefits.

The Muslim Defence League (MDL) was given a police escort in Oldham, where they marched to a political rally to throw bricks and stones at white families.  Incredibly the police didn’t prevent this happening. The police claim it was a counter protest but there wasn’t a protest taking place for them to counter, and neither did they have any banners or placards, just face coverings, eggs, bricks and bottles.

Compare this to the police treatment of white people at the ‘Free Tommy’ events in the summer of last year where they used batons and charged at white British people for far less than the actions of the MDL.

I guess that is the white privilege we hear so much about.

We hear of a racist Muslim man who spat at a white 9-month old baby and escapes prison because he is classed as mentally ill.

We hear of a white man who leaves bacon outside the mosque, is sentenced to 12 months in jail, and dies in prison.

White men are raping white girls; the caring left constantly reminds us that the majority of paedophiles and rapists are white.  This is true but they are typically in isolation and reviled by their community and society.  Gangs of Muslim men are raping white girls, often in large groups, including family members – suggesting cultural and religious acceptance.

Is that the white privilege we hear about, to be raped by not just the white community but by the Muslim community too?  Where is the white privilege of these girls? Do you think they feel privileged?

Mixed race children are being raised to hate their white parent but brown is celebrated as stunning and brave even exotic. The white side is demonised as gammon, racist, knuckle dragger, colonialist, KKK, Nazi and bigoted!

It’s time to stand with our white brothers and sisters and say we are proud to be white nationalists, proud of our culture, proud of our incredible achievements and proud of our traditions. If every other race is allowed to be proud of being nationalists then it is okay for white people.  That’s equality.

I am proud to be mixed race white and if I don’t speak out what future is there for my children? I don’t want them growing up hating an entire race or a part of themselves.








Frankfurt School Theory

Until a few years ago I had never heard of the Frankfurt School Theory and so I am not surprised at the amount of people who have also never heard of it. Unless you go to university where it is drummed into students (the positive elements), chances are you won’t have heard of it either.

Everyone should familiarise themselves with it though and those who are aware of it should educate others on it.

So what is Frankfurt School Theory and how did it come about?  A little background is important but I will focus mainly on the 11 points that make up the theory, some say created to destroy the west and create a new world order.

The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia failed to sweep a Worker’s Revolution into Europe and the USA and so a meeting was organised to discuss why this had failed.  The Bolsheviks were a Jewish sect.

Conservative author Ralp de Toledano (1916-2007) described this as “a meeting more harmful to Western civilisation than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings, George Lukas, a Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and son of a banker moved to Germany where he chaired the first meeting of communist orientated sociologists.  This meeting would lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

Felix Weil born to a wealthy Jewish family in Argentina graduated with doctoral degree in political science.  He became interested in socialism and Marxism.

Carl Grunberg was the Institutes Jewish director from 1923-1929 and was an avowed Marxist.

In 1930 Max Horkheimer took control and believed Marx’s theory should be the basis of Institute’s research.

Then Hitler came into power and the Institute closed, so they fled to USA and ended up as academics at major universities.

People will always argue for and defend their own.  Even those who claim to be for human rights wont question the rot at the heart of their own communities.  They will argue with facts because the facts hurt their feelings. They try to ignore that facts don’t care about their feelings.

There are some people that say Frankfurt School theory is a tin foil hat conspiracy, yet the facts are there in black and white.  There are 11 points and every one of them can be ticked off so make of that what you will.

Creation of racism offences

 The creation of racism offences in the west protects only the minorities, brown and black people.  White people are the racists and no one can ever be racist towards them.

“The Board has been at the forefront of the development of proposals for race legislation in the UK.  It has also sought allies and made common cause with other religious and minority groups. The Board played a fundamental part urging upon government in the first race relations act.” – Board of Deputies of British Jews – 1998.

We can see this every day where minorities are not prosecuted for hate crimes.  One of the many examples is the rape of white girls by mainly Pakistani heritage men. Even when these girls have been raped and called white slags and subjected to the most barbaric of violence it is still not classed as a hate crime. But when these girls retaliate and call the savages ‘pakis’ the girls are threatened with prosecution for hate crime.

To repeat, the barbaric brutal gang rape of an 11-year-old girl while calling her a white slag is not prosecuted as hate crime, yet those same girls calling the beasts ‘pakis’ is a hate crime.

Continual change to create confusion

 Men are women and women are men.  Women are called CIS women and men who think they are women are called trans. If men don’t want to date a woman with a penis and if lesbians don’t want to date a man with boobs then they are transphobes.

Children as young as two years old ‘know’ they are born the wrong sex even though children as young as two don’t even know what they want for dinner.

If you misgender someone you can expect a visit from the police but if you download images of children being abused you can carry on safe in the knowledge that the police are too busy chasing people for mean words on the internet.

Up is down, left is right and wrong is right.

 The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

 This for me is one of the most sinister and disgusting points on this plan and if you have children and are aware you will know that this is happening in education.  Children as young as ten years old are being shown videos of women giving birth, cartoons of men and women having sex.

No child of ten needs to see this.  Ever.  And there is no argument you can have which will convince me otherwise.

The recent ‘trannies reading stories to toddlers’ phenomenon so that they can grow up to be non judgemental is also bullshit. Trannies tend to be asleep all day and out partying all night so unless these toddlers are being taken to clubs they will not be seeing any of them.  The whole thing stinks of degeneracy and the sexualisation of children is blatantly obvious.  And worrying.


Children should be kept innocent for as long as possible and this trend just destroys their innocence earlier.

Undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

 There is little to no respect for teachers and authority with children being disruptive and some not even attending class. Teachers are unable to control the children in their care and in many cases are frightened of the children, especially in high schools where some teachers are only a few years older than the students.


Huge immigration to destroy identity

Mass immigration occurred in the 60s with South Asians, then the 80s with Iraqis and Kurds and now we see it with the Somalians and Syrians.  All of these people are encouraged to have pride in their identity, all these people are proud of their identity and have not forgotten who they are and all these people are encouraged to keep their culture and tolerant Britain allows it.

The indigenous people of Great Britain are the ones who have had their identity destroyed and made to feel shame for having pride of their white culture.  Diversity means getting rid of white people.

 Mass immigration will continue in 2020 and soon they will make it a criminal offence to criticise mass immigration and the vast problems it brings.  Many of you will have seen the “Global Compact for Migration” being signed by world leaders, including Theresa May, with some alarm.  Rightly so.


 Promotion of excessive drinking

 There was a time when alcohol was not sold on a Sunday and it was seen as a day of rest and a day for church, family and Sunday dinner.  Then the licensing laws were changed and alcohol was sold on a Sunday, happy hour was promoted in the pubs and clubs.  The lowering of the price of alcohol in supermarkets making it more accessible to young people. Women too were encouraged to get as drunk as men with the ‘ladette’ culture seen as something to aspire to.


Emptying of churches

Sunday was a day of wearing your Sunday best, attending church with your family and praying.  The sense of community and belonging was strong and people looked out for each other.

After church and prayers people would return home and mothers and grandmothers would prepare the Sunday roast for their families.

Now with the closing of churches and with many being turned into pubs and clubs, families get together on Sundays to go the pubs for their Sunday dinner and drink alcohol.

Many churches have been turned into mosques, flats, pubs and clubs. How many synagogues, temples and mosques have been shut down?

Unreliable legal system with bias against the victims

 Charlene Downes was 15 years old when she disappeared.  She had been exploited and raped by Muslim men, and two Muslim men were accused of killing her, chopping her body up and placing it through the mincer for kebab meat.  Charlene Downes’ parents received £15k in compensation and the men accused of killing her received around £250k in compensation.


The parents of Saffia Rose who was killed in the Manchester Arena bombing received £11k in compensation while a Muslim man who was kept in jail longer for than what he should have been received £100k.



Men who view images of children being abused get a slap on the wrist and no jail time.

Men who rape children are given such light sentences that they may as well be set free.

Parents who mutilate their children’s’ genitals are never punished.

Dependency on the state or state benefits

 Breakdown of the family unit thanks to feminism, which is another article for another day, meaning mothers having to work or claim benefits to survive, mothers are forced to work when their children start primary school.

When I say mothers I actually mean white British working class mothers. The mothers who are in polygamous marriages and cannot speak English will not be forced to work and will be allowed to claim benefits and raise their children.

Control and dumbing down of media

 Who controls the media?  Who decides when there is another rape jihad case being heard in the courts that they will report on the heat wave?  What is of more importance? Telling the truth or lying to the public?

Thanks to social media though we can see for ourselves what the truth is and where the lies are being peddled and even when the proof is there the media still continue to lie.

We have seen an increase in alternative news outlets to counteract the fake news, imagine if we didn’t even have that?


Encouraging the breakdown of the family

Feminists have brainwashed women and young girls into believing they can have it all and that careers and hedonistic lifestyles are more important than being a wife and a mother.  Those that ignore this and do settle down and have children will think nothing of leaving their babies with child minders while they go out to work to pay for the child minder.

The traditional roles of mothers staying at home to be wives and to raise children is frowned upon yet being slaves to employers is encouraged.

Absent fathers, some through choice and others through sheer badness on the mother’s part is not healthy for children who are caught up in their parents’ dramas.